Before any more time elapses in our seminar together please allow me to share my excitement and opinions upon reading one, particular piece of the Participation Book; The Work of Joesph Beuys and Dirk Schwarze Report of Day' proceedings at the Bureau of Direct Democracy. I was personally very moved by this piece. It confirmed for me some inner suspicions I had but could not quite articulate about the close connections between the process of direct democracy and the process of art making. I think Beuys was truly prophetic as an artist in venturing into this area as early as he did, and in the manner that he did at Documenta 5 in the "art world".
To begin with, Beuys explains he wants a system "ruled from bottom to top" (p. 120). How popular is that thought today? The answer is so obvious. But Beuys situates the artist and her practice as a vital harbinger of this idea back in the early 70's. In my opinion, this is still a revolutionary idea today and forms the basis of much art/democratic process behind the many art practices we are learning about.
In terms of my work personally, Beuys provides me with a source of affirmation and kinship. Speaking to all his visitors to the Documenta 5, reminds me of the community work I have done with my neighbors over the past two years, patiently explaining to so many people on the street the simple idea that the common voice of the people "counts", and by that I mean, each and every voice. We have diligently challenged a long standing notion in our neighborhood that a select few community members (most of whom have personal profit as their main "ideology")
represent the voice of the "the many".
In addition, we have been fighting the large anonymous hulk that is corporate "development"/America. To do so, we have used our own voices, and the voices of our neighbors as a simple but effective means of protest and reminder of humanity. We have tried to fight the proliferation of enormous luxury condos developments all over our small scale neighborhood with valid questions about infrastructure; safety; schools; environment; and more, i.e. with community concerns that affect us all. What is the role of an artist in an enterprise like this? The answer is mulit-layered and deserves a post all its own. It also lies in our very own "interdisciplinary art practices", does it not?
I left off my last post describing the impact of one flyer upon my neighborhood, Link. , the one penned by "Athena Lloyd Wright",an anonymous artist speaking for the neighborhood whose voice was quickly heard. Others responded so enthusiastically because others wanted their authentic voice to be heard by those in power too. One voice quickly became many.
A petition was formed and linked to the CORD blog. Link. Many other coalitions and groups have used free, on-line petitions as well and we learned from them too. In fact free petition hosting websites exist all over the web such as:
First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States :
"Congress shall make no law...abridging...the right of the people peaceably
to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
After that first mural at the Democracy Wall, events in my community unfolded very rapidly and in quick succession. A coalition was born out of the various block associations near the luxury Condo development, Oliver House, and the flyer was the first piece of what later became coined the "Democracy Wall" (Robert Guskind, journalist/blogger as I mentioned in my earlier post.)
A search for the Democracy Wall at the Gowanus Lounge Blog will yield several results. (gowanuslounge.blogspot.com and/or gowanuslounge.com).
The coalition called CG CORD/Coalition for Respectful Development has a blog that I have maintain at www.carrollgardenspetition.blogspot.com Link and features many images of the Democracy Wall on the right hand side of the blog. I was also featured on the Brooklyn TV news several times: Here is a link to one broadcast: www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjFx-OlXT10
* These comments and some images from the Democracy wall and much more will be the content of an upcoming exhibition I am taking part in: "Brooklyn Utopias" http://brooklynutopias.com More on this exhibition in a subsequent post.
Beuys states: "This is a model of freedom, a revolutionary model of freedom. And there also must be free press, free television, and so-on, independent of state influence" (p. 124). "We must probe (theory of knowledge) the moment of origin of free individual productive potency (creativity)" (p. 125). I feel I have lived these words and seen their power on the streets of my Brooklyn neighborhood as I have witnessed the utter joy of people realizing their ability to speak up in creative ways that they can invent on their own with their own creativity.
Beoys believes each and every person should vote rather than us having elected representatives in government. He begs the question I pose here:
How do you think a "direct democracy" would work in the USA? Could it work? Would it be better than electing representatives, so many of whom are owned by various special interest groups? How would that affect our art and our work as artists?
I am just wondering aloud here.....
And another thought provoking statement he makes:
"Do you see yourself as an individualist and do you see your office here as an isolated department?"
Beuys: "No in no way. I do not see myself as isolated here. I have all kinds of possibilities here. I can speak freely with everyone. No one has prevented me yet....." (p. 124).
Was the "Democracy Wall" in Carroll Gardens owned by any one person and/or did it exist in isolation?
Answer: No it was an ongoing dialogue between the community and the issues affecting it. It was created by all and belonged to all.
Question: Is there any space on your street for a "Democracy Wall" I wonder? Public space is limited and getting scarcer every day, another sign of the "times"....
What are the pressing issues in your neighborhood? Could there be more "Democracy Walls" all across America?